[3.25] CWDT Ward Loop Scion
Will I do these bosses on the low budget version (not uber versions): maven, shaper, elder, The Searing Exarch, The Eater of Worlds ??
|
|
hi , i try this build and i can't make uber lab
actually 2.255 HP / 115 shield / 2941 ward (1456 on flask ) run only 2 flask for perma flask actually because i need the lab for pathfinder point how can i make the lab ? trap is fatal for me like in 1 hit :/ wardloop is ok with my stat actually ( 1 ring 420 and 1 ring 350 ) summon skel is 0.23 cooldown and last 0.31 sec Editado por útlima vez por fyrosis#3889 en 30 ago. 2022 10:36:18
|
|
try using only 1 flask
or ask somebody to carry you or respec and connect to scion tree, disconnect from witch tree. |
|
Hello there. Since divine nerf hard to take "to dust" with good rolls. I have a question. Can we make a 23% quality "minion speed" support gem? It will provide 46% reduced Minion Duration (not 40%). Can somebody share skele duration calculations? Thank you.
|
|
I'm putting the build together before leveling, is this belt screwed because it only has 18% reduced? Editado por útlima vez por PowerCrazy#3075 en 30 ago. 2022 23:51:24
|
|
" use this flask calculator https://instacalc.com/55832 |
|
" total 99% reduced 46% gem, rest from to dust |
|
https://im.ge/i/OCGZ7q If you find trouble encounter this stupid bubble just hop inside and spam the "x" (weapon swap) button |
|
Hey, I currently have the following stats under the misc tab:
Flask Duration Modifier: +48% Flask Charges Used Modifier: -20% Flask Charges Gained Modifier: +100% Belt has: 20% reduced Flask Charges used Is the "flask charges gained" field @ https://instacalc.com/55832 the +100% -20% = 80% in my case? That would at least explain why I cannot keep the flask running. |
|
So I got the build up and running and it is awesome, but I'm curious what the best way to scale defenses is? I'll sometimes die and I'm not sure why. I will say I am not shock or curse immune so if that's all I needed I'll go for that. If getting increased ward on gear is substantial I'll go for that as well, was just curious if there was another layer I was missing somewhere.
|
|