trading in this game sucks, add a marketplace
" emtwo, do you really want a web-browser to be a part of the game? I really hope that GGG does not want this to be so... Web-browser trading usually leads to increased password-stealing and item-loss, not to mention a reduction in people actually playing the game. How is it a better interface to have to open a web-brower, travel to a website, login to the website, shop for items, exchange items/currency 'online' through the www, then launch PoE, login AGAIN, select character, and finally attempt to use the item(s) you traded for. Wtf. I suppose many people don't mind having a browser open along with the PoE game client; but if you are going to do this, why not just be able to trade within the game client to begin with? I guess the idea is to be able to trade completely outside of the game, which would be a nice option to have, but definitely not necessary. Trading using a web-browser should only be secondary to in-game trading, imo. TY to those who called me out on my BS on these forums. There is no benefit to being so selfish as to fail to acknowledge others' differing beliefs of what "should be" or believe your own opinions so supreme as to be factual and thus dismiss others' opinions as being somehow a lie or delusional. Editado por útlima vez por Perfect_Black#6704 en 18 ago. 2013 21:35:53
|
![]() |
" Exactly this. If not secondary to in-game trading, just do away with outside-trading via third-party sources and trade forums entirely when (eventually and hopefully) an efficient Trade System is implemented into PoE. When game developers ignore the criticism that would improve their game, the game fails. Just because a game receives a great amount of praise vs. only a small amount of criticism does not mean to call it a day and make a foolish misplaced assumption that it is perfect. (me) Editado por útlima vez por HeavyMetalGear#2712 en 18 ago. 2013 22:39:24
|
![]() |
" Do you disable cookies or something? Open up web-browser, click book mark to PoE forums, start trading. Why doesit need to be more complex than that? |
![]() |
" Why should Path of Exile require a Web Browser for full functionality? Break the forum-trade cycle, lobby for a proper in-game trading system, and don't let over-powered exploiters or 3rd-party traders infringe on your experiences in Wraeclast (also don't befriend them or trade with them, exile them from your consciousness). And yes, I disable cookies. TY to those who called me out on my BS on these forums. There is no benefit to being so selfish as to fail to acknowledge others' differing beliefs of what "should be" or believe your own opinions so supreme as to be factual and thus dismiss others' opinions as being somehow a lie or delusional. Editado por útlima vez por Perfect_Black#6704 en 19 ago. 2013 13:18:41
|
![]() |
" thats exactly what i want spaming your shit in all 12 trade chanels and wasting so much time looking for buyers is just not fun ign: ALLRAUDER Editado por útlima vez por Luuu90#5383 en 19 ago. 2013 16:52:08
|
![]() |
" Let's be perfectly honest with ourselves. Any in-game trading system that GGG creates will be clunky and inefficient compared to what you can get with a web-browser. It would be like trying to implement an in-game Wiki or an in-game Twitch player. Whatever they come up with, it won't have the functionality or efficiency of simply going to the wiki or going to twitch or going to the trading forums. |
![]() |
" Do you have that little faith in GGG? Wtf. TY to those who called me out on my BS on these forums. There is no benefit to being so selfish as to fail to acknowledge others' differing beliefs of what "should be" or believe your own opinions so supreme as to be factual and thus dismiss others' opinions as being somehow a lie or delusional.
|
![]() |
" If they could create a more efficient browser, they'd be making billions of dollars from that instead of creating PoE. It's not that I don't have faith in them, it's that the task is simply beyond the capacity of a company their size. |
![]() |
" TY to those who called me out on my BS on these forums. There is no benefit to being so selfish as to fail to acknowledge others' differing beliefs of what "should be" or believe your own opinions so supreme as to be factual and thus dismiss others' opinions as being somehow a lie or delusional. Editado por útlima vez por Perfect_Black#6704 en 20 ago. 2013 14:30:12
|
![]() |
You guys make this out to be the Laws of Physics. There is no denying (I have not seen good reason(s) yet on how not) that my idea is close to the very best it's going to get for fast gratification, efficiency, etc. between players trading between players in PoE.
Consult my very first post on the first page, go to the link, read it, then get back with me. PoE does not need an item filter system so they can see the cheapest prices on items. Let's not kid ourselves in that we all know such a feature is used mainly for that very thing. Do you know what this kind of system does in the long-run? It creates a lowball mindset in trade in that when traders purposely lowball items, be it they BUY or SELL them, someone else is going to try and compete with that lowball. Before you know it, the value of items will go down! PoE's current bartering system between players, combined with my idea = the most legit trade system you're going to get in almost any game, including but not limited to, PoE. P.S. It's not because game companies cannot add an awesome filtration system like you guys speak of on these sites, it's because they're smart and know it's not a good system for the above reasons. Look at Diablo III's Auction House. It's a fail beached whale. Do you know why? Because it's lowballers competing against other lowballers in trade. When game developers ignore the criticism that would improve their game, the game fails. Just because a game receives a great amount of praise vs. only a small amount of criticism does not mean to call it a day and make a foolish misplaced assumption that it is perfect. (me) Editado por útlima vez por HeavyMetalGear#2712 en 20 ago. 2013 14:57:17
|
![]() |