New Support Gem: PPAD cements Path of Spectral Throw and Bows.

"
Nephalim escribió:
this gem is remarkably powerful considering physical damage was already very strong before its existence.

i would encourage people not to get too attached.

physical bows are under powered because the only people using them were rip queens with too many exalts and too little in game knowledge. yes im talking about the 567 dps one up for mirror. however, this gem makes ES/VP ST builds ridiculous.

also, pee-pad is an amusing acronym.


Nothing CWDT + Enduring + Immortal Call + Increased Duration cannot fix. Gives you enough time to react to just having off-screen shot a phys reflect pack.
This message was delivered by GGG defence force.
"
demivion escribió:
Path of CI
Path of Life
Path of armor
Path of melee
path of spells
path of CWDT
path of defense
path of reflect
path of spectral throw and bows?


at some point you just have to call it path of exile, balance changes all the time, get over it noob


Path of Armor, Path of spells, Path of CWDT, Path of Defense, Path of Reflect have not really existed as far as I know. I didn't play the closed beta though XD.

Edit: Path of Melee has not really existed either. Aegis Aurora has practically always been a very strong build, but that's it XD.
This message was delivered by GGG defence force.
Editado por útlima vez por mazul#2568 en 11 dic. 2013 12:42:27
I don't know about you but for my spectral throw character (marauder), faster attacks seems like a much better gem than this.
"
dontsleep escribió:
I don't know about you but for my spectral throw character (marauder), faster attacks seems like a much better gem than this.


Sure, faster attacks is better, but faster attacks is not the one you'll remove for this.
This message was delivered by GGG defence force.
very nice gem, good work :)
GMT+1 - You can speak German with me
"
Mahesys escribió:

Where did these calculations come from??? maybe i'm worong but shouldn't be DPS calculate this way:

If you have 200 physical damage and 2 attack per second, your DPS is 400 ok? with a 49% physical increase gem AND 10% reduced attack speed (still gem) you can obtain 200*1,49(gem)*1,8(aps) = 536 dps.

Now with added fire damage at level 20 you add 39% of physical as fire damage. So you gain 200*0,39(gem)*2(aps) = 156 dps as fire. Add these 156 to 400 physical DPS and you have 556 combined dps

So with added fire dmg you would have 3,59% more dps.

Even with say 100% more physical damage passives it should be the same: 200 physical damage with phys proj gem would become 200*2(100% passive)*1,49(gem)*1,8(aps) = 1072 dps

With added fire damage you would have 400*0,39(gem)*2(aps) = 312 fire dps. Added to physical dps which is 200*2(100% passive)*2(aps) = 800 you would have 1112 combined dps

So again with added fire dmg you would have 3,59% more dps.


Good, now do your calculations again, with the REAL mechanics:

Factor in
a) enemies fire resist
b) enemies def

Calculate the breakpoint at which fire-resistance needs to be in order to make added fire do more damage.
Make charts of different defs vs. different resistances.

Example:
Your example on a mob with 75% fire res and 0 def would greatly favor the new gem! (:
"
mazul escribió:
"
dontsleep escribió:
I don't know about you but for my spectral throw character (marauder), faster attacks seems like a much better gem than this.


Sure, faster attacks is better, but faster attacks is not the one you'll remove for this.


Hmm... In a ST + Added Fire + Faster Attacks + LMP + WED combo, this gem's probably better than just WED. Getting RGGGG will be hard tho :(
"
dontsleep escribió:
"
mazul escribió:
"
dontsleep escribió:
I don't know about you but for my spectral throw character (marauder), faster attacks seems like a much better gem than this.


Sure, faster attacks is better, but faster attacks is not the one you'll remove for this.


Hmm... In a ST + Added Fire + Faster Attacks + LMP + WED combo, this gem's probably better than just WED. Getting RGGGG will be hard tho :(


Seems like it would be very easy on an evasion chest. My guess is you would probably want to actually just add the new gem and go RRGGGG if you had a 6L.
Im supprised no one said this gem will make EK insane
"
Neode995 escribió:
Im supprised no one said this gem will make EK insane


Physical Projectile ATTACK Damage

Reportar publicación del foro

Reportar cuenta:

Tipo de reporte

Información adicional