RIP Bisco's?
https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2092600
" Before Bisco's effective IIQ was 30-40% with 0 investment into normal monsters, doesn't look as OP compared to competitors (Ascetic (15%) / Shaper's (10% max roll) ammy) anymore. Editado por útlima vez por SunL4D2#6224 en 26 feb. 2018 23:32:27 Reflotado por última vez en 28 feb. 2018 10:33:46
|
![]() |
Much like manufactured news, leaving out the next line for people too lazy to read the entire post
" |
![]() |
With zero IIQ, 100% bisco gives roughly 25.8 more drops, 505 bisco gives roughly 17% more drops.
It was never deserving of a nerf in the first place. IGN: Arlianth Check out my LA build: 1782214 Editado por útlima vez por Nephalim#2731 en 26 feb. 2018 23:51:20
|
![]() |
" Based on what exactly? Theoretical calculations don't really add up according to my thorough testing. Bisco's is much more powerful than people believe (was it 18-22% IIQ according to some sketchy calculation?). |
![]() |
Even it's a nerf but so what ? If you want to farm stuff then you MUST use it, then basically, your gear won't change, so nothing changed
Editado por útlima vez por cuocdoitan#5719 en 27 feb. 2018 0:01:26
|
![]() |
" Data seems reasonable but only GGG knows the exact forumula. It is fairly agreed upon bisco is equal to 18-22 raw iiq though. https://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/7zyyu8/the_formula_behind_iiq_and_how_many_drops_you_get/ IGN: Arlianth Check out my LA build: 1782214 Editado por útlima vez por Nephalim#2731 en 27 feb. 2018 0:04:51
|
![]() |
" And what exactly makes your thorough testing not at all sketchy ? lol, you know the more posts you make like this, the more you just appear to be a total prick If theres still no better alternative, then it will remain BIS, and wont affect the value of it, infact itll just create more legacy ones, upping their value over time. Editado por útlima vez por awright#1711 en 27 feb. 2018 0:23:55
|
![]() |
" Yeah, that guy does great job, but actual results results speak better to me than reasonable assumptions. I actually hope it's gonne be dirty cheap because of mass hysteria and overreaction, so I can get desirable corruption on still BIS IIQ ammy this time. :p " Practical results > Theoretical reults. Editado por útlima vez por SunL4D2#6224 en 27 feb. 2018 0:49:49
|
![]() |
" So I presume you have logged your practical results and have a strong enough dataset to make a statement like that yes ? |
![]() |
Only 2 threads in less than 10 minutes? Where's the third one? You're slacking.
On point your practical results are not only debatable but also inexistent. Or you'd have posted them in your main. |
![]() |